The World Lost $160 Billion to Disasters Last Year, and Climate Change Played a Big Role

Illustration for article titled The World Lost $160 Billion to Disasters Last Year, and Climate Change Played a Big Role
Photo: Getty

2018 was the year climate change became ever clearer, with wildfires, cyclones, and hurricanes ravaging the world. Now we have the receipts.

Advertisement

Insurance behemoth Munich Re released its annual accounting of all the damage wrought by weather and natural disasters on Tuesday. It shows that catastrophes—some of which were likely amplified by climate change—caused $160 billion in losses globally, with just four events in the U.S. responsible for a third of all losses. The news, unfortunately, comes on a day when we learned U.S. greenhouse gas emissions rose last year and at a time when the leader of the free world is a climate denier.

The Munich Re report shines a light on all the ways in which the planet is changing as well as all the natural calamities we face. On that front, the worst disaster was September’s tsunami that struck Indonesia, killing 2,100 and causing widespread damage.

But the biggest losses financially were all driven by wild weather, with the top three spots belonging to U.S. catastrophes. California’s Camp Fire, which caused nearly the entire town of Paradise to burn to the ground, leads the list with losses of $16.5 billion. That’s followed by Hurricane Michael ($16 billion in losses) and Hurricane Florence ($14 billion). Typhoon Jebi and flooding, both which afflicted Japan, round out the top five while other notable climate-related catastrophes include Europe’s major heat wave and drought and California’s Woolsey Fire. The only silver lining is that while $160 billion in losses is above average, it’s still well below the $350 billion in losses that befell the world in 2017.

Munich Re said the fires in particular show “clear indications of the influence that man-made climate change” has had on losses. California, like the rest of the world, has warmed thanks to human carbon emissions. That’s created a situation where large fires are becoming more common, destructive, and happening basically any time of the year. And in California, the nation’s most populace state, it has spelled absolute calamity. Last year was the worst year for wildfire losses on record, according to Munich Re.

“Our data shows that the losses from wildfires in California have risen dramatically in recent years,” Ernst Rauch, head of Climate and Geosciences at Munich Re, said in a statement. “At the same time, we have experienced a significant increase in hot, dry summers, which has been a major factor in the formation of wildfires.”

But wildfires aren’t alone in their clear climate change links. An analysis found that climate change doubled the odds of the European heat wave that revealed signs of ancient civilization and shrunk Sweden’s tallest peak. Hurricane Florence’s record rainfall is right in line with climate change trends towards juicier storms. And Michael’s storm surge got a boost from higher sea levels.

Advertisement

All this points to the need to slash carbon emissions rather than letting them rise. The reason is as much financial as it is humanitarian. Munich Re isn’t crunching these numbers from the bottom of its heart. They’re cold, hard calculations of climate risks and how those risks threaten the $56 billion in annual insurance policies the company underwrites. And those calculations could eventually mean certain places become uninsurable and people have to move or become homeless.

Managing editor at Earther, writing about climate change, environmental justice, and, occasionally, my cat.

DISCUSSION

dnapl
Dense non aqueous phase liquid

A while back oil and gas pipeliners were telling us that spills are good for the economy.

Oil Company Argues Oil Spills Are Good for the Economy

Maybe that’s why, buried deep in Kinder Morgan’s 15,000 page submission to the NEB, the oil company argued oil spills “can have both positive and negative effects on local and regional economies,” because of the economic benefits brought on by clean-up efforts. “Spill response and clean-up creates business and employment opportunities for affected communities, regions, and clean-up service providers,” the report reads.

So as far as climate change economics goes - one person’s costs is another person’s revenues. That $160 billion from government, insurance and personal wealth ended up in someone else’s pocket. The secret to art of the deal style economics is to be the someone else.

You see, just like an oil spill contributing to the emergency response, free product vacuum truck suckage and soil & groundwater remediation community - climate change impacts will contribute to natural hazard responders, building materials manufacturers, sea wall builders, perpetual civil/infrastructure redo engineers, coastal areas moving van companies, etc.

Trump U. MAGA Econ 301: Climate change stimulus, i.e. disaster capitalism.

Students will learn how to ignore climate science, climate change mitigation and general natural disaster preparedness to become proficient at the sweet sweet opportunities that abound for climate change impacts emergency response and rebuilding.