Yahoo's Blazing the Trail to Transparency in the Post-PRISM World

Illustration for article titled Yahoos Blazing the Trail to Transparency in the Post-PRISM World

On Monday, Yahoo won a court fight that will force the government to disclose secret information about a 2008 case that required Yahoo to hand over customer data. It's icing on the cake for Marissa Mayer, who celebrates her one year anniversary at Yahoo this week. But more importantly, it could give us our clearest look at PRISM's inner workings yet.


While it remains to be seen how much information the government will surrender, transparency advocates should be cheering Yahoo's victory. This doesn't happen that often.

The specifics of the case remain somewhat cloudy. Yahoo's winning decision was handed down by the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court that handles all wiretapping requests for law enforcement and national security purposes. Yahoo's victory is such a coup because groups like the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) have been trying for years to get the government to reveal more about what goes on in the FISA courtroom.


The government's been cagey, though, hiding behind the court's inherent secrecy. Apparently, however, nobody told the president. Last month on Charlie Rose, Obama defended the court's track record of granting surveillance privileges for everyone that asks, while not disclosing a single detail about who's making the requests or what they're doing with the information. "It is transparent," President Obama said. "That's why we set up the FISA court." Well, no it's not transparent, Mr. President. It's a secret court. That's the opposite of transparent!

Fortunately for America and for freedom, the tables are starting to turn. And again, this doesn't happen that often. The last time that the FISA court ordered the government to give up information about a case was in 2002 for a Patriot Act case involving Donald Rumsfeld. While it's tough to speculate why the FISA court's opening the kimono after over a decade in the dark, it's undeniable that it's dealing with heavy criticism in the wake of the PRISM revelations. At the present, there are no less than five cases in federal court that have been filed since Snowden's big reveal.

Whether to diffuse the tension over PRISM or simply to review the specifics of Yahoo's case, the government is starting to bend under the pressure. However, as any transparency advocate will tell you, it's not time to celebrate until we see exactly how much the government reveals. It'd be a bummer to get all excited about the new age of transparency when the government hands over a box full of blacked out, redacted documents. It has a habit of doing that. [AP]

Image via Fotopedia


Share This Story

Get our newsletter



There is no post-PRISM world. PRISM will be replaced with TRACKR, which will cause an uproar and be replaced with SEEING-I, etc etc... The government will always find a way to track you while you're online.

You have two options: come to terms with it, or fkn do something about it. The entire US govt needs an overhaul before things like this will change. Republicans, Democrats, everyone is to blame.

You want change? VOTE, people. And when that doesn't work, VOTE again. Keep voting, keep the govt honest. It's our biggest and best power. Never let them rest on their laurels.