
Fast radio bursts, or FRBs, are a source of endless fascination. But despite a decade of observations, not all astronomers are sure that theyāre real. A study out in Nature today, which reports the very first recurring FRB, may cause lingering skepticism to evaporate.
āI think this is pretty huge,ā Peter Williams, an astronomer at Harvardās Center for Astrophysics who was not involved with the study, told Gizmodo. āFor awhile, I wasnāt sure these things were genuinely astrophysical. This paper settles the question.ā
And Williams is not one to take splashy new claims about FRBsāhigh energy radio pulses of unknown origin, which flit across the sky for a fraction of a secondālightly. In fact, heās spent the last week raising major doubts about another recent study, which, as Gizmodo and other outlets reported, claimed to have pinpointed the location of an FRB in space for the first time.
The repeating burst reported in Nature, FRB 121102, was detected by an international team of astronomers using the most sensitive radio telescope in the world, the Arecibo Observatory in Puerto Rico. Not only is 121102 the first instance of a recurrent FRB, itās the first FRB detected with anything other than the Parkes Observatory in Australia. (There are 16 other published FRBs to date.)
āParkes has wide field of view but low sensitivity,ā Jason Hessels, a researcher at the Netherlands Institute for Radio Astronomy and co-author on the new study, told Gizmodo. āArecibo has small field of view, but once you find something, you can dig much more deeply.ā
Advertisement
Hessels and his collaborators spotted FRB 121102 in 2012 during a survey of pulsars, rapidly-rotating stellar relics that emit beams of radio energy. āConventional wisdom was that this source wasnāt going to repeat,ā Hessels said. āBut we decided to spend some time confirming that.ā
Hesselsā team obtained additional observations last spring, and were amazed to discover not just one or two, but ten additional radio bursts. These bursts occurred in the same patch of sky, and had the same ādispersion measureāāa metric that tells astronomers how far radio waves have traveled to reach our receivers. āThis unambiguously identifies FRB 121102 as repeating,ā Hessels and his co-authors write.
Advertisement

And that, in turn, has big implications for what could be causing the mysterious energy bursts, which have been attributed to everything from pulsars to merging neutron stars to supernovae.
āQuite simply, whatever is producing repeating [FRBs] isnāt being destroyed,ā Hessels said. āThis is a really important insight.ā
Advertisement
But the discovery gets even more interesting. The bursts donāt come at regular intervals, but are instead clustered in time. āOn one observation we saw six pulses within ten minutes,ā Hessels said, āand there are many observations where we donāt see any.ā
āThe other really weird thing about the repeat bursts is that they have very different spectra,ā he added.
So, weāre looking at a high energy and highly variable pulse that occurs at seemingly random intervals. What could be causing such an event? Hessels and his co-authors discuss one intriguing possibility: an insanely dense, rapidly rotating dead star with a magnetic field a thousand trillion times greater than the one youāre sitting in right now. Called a magnetar, this is a very special and exotic type of neutron star. If you were foolish enough to approach one in a spaceship, itād stretch every atom in your body into a pencil-shaped rod.
Advertisement
According to Hessels, itās plausible that āstarquakesāārapid reconfigurations in a neutron starās magnetic fieldācould be behind the exceptional signal.
Before they can be certain, Hessels and his team need to figure out exactly where in space the FRBs are coming from.āIf we can localize the signal to another galaxy and get an idea of the distance, then we really know how much energy is involved,ā he said.
Advertisement
But nailing down the location of an FRB is no easy task, which brings us to the radio burst study published last week in Nature, which claims to have done so for the first time, linking FRB 150418 to a quiescent galaxy located six billion light years away.
Unfortunately, the teamās conclusions started to unravel over the weekend, when Williams, along with Harvard astronomer Edo Berger, found new evidence that they argue invalidate any associations between FRB 150418 and this particular location. (Much more on Williamsā new findings here.) āIām reluctant to say weāve debunked it yet, but I think weāve raised questions,ā Williams said.
In an email to Gizmodo, Keane declined to comment on the recent development. āWe are of course aware of that piece of work by Williams & Berger, and indeed are performing our own ongoing studies,ā he wrote. āWhen weāve completed and fully considered those we will certainly report our findings.ā
Advertisement
However the latest controversy shakes out, both Keane and Hesselsā studies underscore the challenges associated with trying to understand fleeting cosmic signals. But this is the scientific process, in all of its messy glory. Perhaps itāll turn out that there are many different celestial phenomenaāfrom the furious quakes of giant cosmic magnets to colliding starsābehind these elusive energy pulses. I personally canāt wait to see what we discover.
[Nature]
Follow the author @themadstone
Advertisement