We Were Wrong About What Happened After Europeans Reached America

Illustration for article titled We Were Wrong About What Happened After Europeans Reached America

The tale of Europeans explorers’ arrival in the Americas is a dark one, colored by slavery, slaughter, and smallpox. But a new study calls key details of that story into question, including how quickly Native American societies succumbed to disease, and how Earth’s climate responded.


While many scholars believe that the diseases brought by early Spanish explorers spread like wildfire across North America, research led by Harvard anthropologist Matthew Liebmann indicates that the demise of native populations was much more gradual. In the Pueblo communities of the American Southwest, disease didn’t break out until around 1610—roughly a century after Europeans made first contact.

“It’s too simple to say that disease spread evenly all the way through North and South America,” Liebmann, whose work is detailed today in the Proceedings of the National Academies of Sciences, told Gizmodo. “That holds in some places, but we can’t say it’s true for the Americas north of Mexico anymore.”

To reach that conclusion, Liebmann and his colleagues turned to LiDAR, a remote sensing technology that uses lasers to penetrate thick vegetation and map the ground beneath it. With LiDAR, Liebmann was able to reconstruct the architecture of 18 Pueblo villages located in present-day New Mexico. Harvard graduate students used this data to work out the volume of each building, and estimate how many people lived in it. According to Liebmann, most villages were home to anywhere between 200 and 500 people around the turn of the 16th century.

The date at which each village collapsed was established using tree rings growth patterns. In each case, the researchers found that tree growth took off between 1630 to 1650—suggesting that the people who’d been logging for building materials and firewood had vanished. Liebmann estimates that the population across the region dropped from roughly 6,500 individuals to less than 900.

Illustration for article titled We Were Wrong About What Happened After Europeans Reached America

Ruins of a Wukoki Pueblo village, via Perry Quan / Flickr

“This would have happened extremely abruptly,” he said. “Literally, one person might have seen nine out of ten people die within his lifetime. You can imagine what that would do to the entire structure of society.”


According to Liebmann, the timing of this dieoff is quite telling. It wasn’t due to the Pueblo Indians’ first contact with Europeans, which occurred around a century earlier. His hunch? It was probably European livestock.

“There were probably only one or two Europeans with boots on the ground in this region at this time,” he said. “But the other thing that’s coming into America at the time is livestock—cattle, sheep and pigs. I think there’s a strong possibility that animals were as much a vector of disease as Europeans.” Liebmann points out that around the same time as the Pueblo population crash, pigs brought over from the Old World were starting to multiply like crazy in the Southeast.


“Europeans had 10,000 years living with these animals and building up immunity,” Liebmann added. “Obviously, North Americans didn’t.”

It’s a theory that has yet to be verified. But when European diseases eventually struck North America, the impact reached far beyond humans. As Liebmann’s tree ring data indicates, forests around Pueblo villages began to grow back thicker after people disappeared. And in this dry Southwestern climate, more wood meant more fuel for fires.


“Fires leave scars on tree rings,” Liebmann said. “Before 1620, we see lots of evidence for very small fires. But when you remove people, you see a wholesale shift toward much larger and more widespread fires.”

The ecological shifts Liebmann and his colleagues see in the Southwest—more trees, more fire—stand to inform an ongoing debate about how much the arrival of Europeans in North America impacted ecosystems and global climate. Archaeologists working in the Amazon also believe that the loss of native populations led to increased forest growth, and additional sequestration of carbon from the atmosphere. Some have even gone so far as to suggest that forest regrowth after the demise of South American societies led to a global cooling event right around 1610.


While Liebmann says his data can’t lend evidence toward that particular climate change event—the disappearance of the Pueblo Indians occurred just a little too late to line up—it does support the notion that the arrival of Europeans and their diseases had profound, perhaps global, ripple effects. Human history, it seems, has been intertwined with that of our planet for a very long time.


Follow the author @themadstone

Top image: An empty landscape in northern New Mexico where a Pueblo village used to flourish, via Perry Quan / Flickr




I would highly recommend the books 1491 and 1493 to anyone who is interested in this sort of thing. It’s a well researched history of America before and after the European (re)discovery of America. It’s a well needed corrective to both “sides” of the debate over European colonization of the Americas - it really brings home the horror of what happened but also shows how inadvertent and troubling much of it was even to the Europeans. Not that there isn’t a whole lot of nasty to be atoned for - it’s just also interesting to see how lots of it was caused by activities no one in that time could have suspected to be devastating (bringing livestock?) and how several groups assumed to be mustache-twirling villains (the Catholic Church) were actually extremely troubled by what was occurring and desperate to figure out how to stop it.