The science in Interstellar is a mixed bag: black holes are very real, but a planet orbiting a black hole would look very different and shuttles don't fly on fumes. The whole movie is like that: the astrophysics is either totally spot-on, or absolutely not, and even makes the science consultant cringe.
Have you seen Interstellar? What are your thoughts on the science? Does the emphasis on astrophysical accuracy make the inaccuracies stand out even more? Or does it create spare plausibility, helping carry the story through its more outrageous asks?
10 November Update: On Physics Today, editor Charles Day is discussing the science of the extinction scenario. Meanwhile, you know Neil DeGrasse Tyson can't help but add his comments on the science of the movie in a series of tweets: