Moon Could Have Been Habitable Once, Scientists Speculate

Lunar surface image taken during Apollo 11 mission.
Lunar surface image taken during Apollo 11 mission.
Photo: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (Flickr)

The Moon today is not habitable. It’s covered in potentially killer dust and seemingly dry as a bone. But though it seems wild to think, a new perspective wonders: What if the Moon used to be friendly to life?

Advertisement

Scientist Dirk Schulze-Makuch from TU Berlin and Ian Crawford from Birkbeck, University of London speculate that, while it might seem “outrageous,” recent results show that the Moon is wetter than scientists have previously thought—so maybe, once, it had the conditions for life.

They’re not saying it did, of course. “Whether life ever arose on the Moon, or was transported to it from elsewhere, is of course highly speculative and can only be addressed by an aggressive future program of lunar exploration,” they write in the article, published in the journal Astrobiology. I encourage you to read the article, as it’s free and pretty comprehensible for a scientific paper.

Advertisement

This habitability period, if it really occurred, might have happened either just after the Moon’s formation from a massive collision with Earth 4.5 billion years ago, or 3.5 billion years ago, after a period of volcanism which may have resulted in a thin lunar atmosphere.

Such an atmosphere would have lasted perhaps tens of millions of years. Maybe water existed on the Moon at this point. Maybe 10 million years was enough time for some rudimentary life to evolve on the Moon. Maybe Earthly life traveled over to the Moon on asteroids. Who knows.

The researchers stress that “habitability requires much more than just the presence of a significant atmosphere and liquid water.” One such requirement would be the presence of organic compounds. And there are obviously not the same water-created features on the Moon that we see here on Earth or on Mars, like drainage channels—though maybe these existed and were eroded by small meteors and solar winds. While the paper doesn’t present new data, it’s an interesting synthesis of lots of existing research demonstrating that, since the Moon is wetter than was initially thought, maybe it’s worth wondering whether it was once habitable.

If you were disappointed that the current administration has decided to send humans back to the Moon rather than to Mars, at least there might be some especially interesting science waiting for us there.

Advertisement

[Astrobiology]

Science Writer, Founder of Birdmodo

Share This Story

Get our newsletter

DISCUSSION

iamsonotamused
IAmSoNotAmused

I’m not really dissappointed in the current administration’s plans for the moon, because neither it nor any previous administration’s plans for moon or Mars have been remotely serious.

Serious human exploration of the solar system ended the moment Nixon killed Apollo in lieu of the STS so he could slash NASA’s funding. And he did that because the public stopped giving a damn(at least, enough of a damn to sustain that level of funding) about the moon landings.

The bloated, yet modest, STS/ISS have still managed to strangle funding for robotic exploration, and if that wasn’t bad enough, piss poor project management has turned probes like JWST into money pits.

Its not just the executive branch either. Congress is, with a couple exceptions, solely interested in the space program as a pork funnel for various humid holes spread across the gulf coast.