
CyberGhost and Surfshark are some of the many providers that prove that you don’t have to spend much to enjoy a VPN. From privacy and security to streaming, torrenting, and superb compatibility. Everything you need is here. This, along with their similar prices, makes the choice very difficult, but not impossible.
To make things easier, we decided to put our best effort into this CyberGhost vs Surfshark VPN comparison for 2026. We’ll do this through our eight comprehensive tests, comparing the two options side-by-side. It’s vital to highlight all the nuances so that you can decide what’s best for you. Let’s dive right in.
CyberGhost vs Surfshark: Quick Conclusion
We’ll be respectful of your time, so if you’re in a rush or are too lazy to read, Surfshark is better than CyberGhost. At a lower monthly price, the former offers way more in terms of security, speed, simultaneous connections, and bypassing censorship. Here’s an overview of their features; our full comparison is below.
| CyberGhost | Surfshark | |
| Our Current Ranking 📋 | #6 | #5 |
| Price 🤑 | Starts at $2.03/mo | Starts at $1.99/mo |
| Money-Back Guarantee 🪙 | Up to 45 days | 30 days |
| Free Version/Free Trial 🆓 | No/Yes, 24 hours on Windows/macOS, 3 days on Android, 7 days on iOS | No/Yes, 7 days on iOS/Android |
| Logging/Jurisdiction 🕵️ | No/Romania | No/Netherlands |
| Protocols 🌐 | OpenVPN, WireGuard, IKEv2 | OpenVPN, WireGuard, IKEv2 |
| Servers 🏠 | 12,000+ in 100 countries | 4,500+ in 100 countries |
| RAM-Only Servers 🛡️ | Yes | Yes |
| Specialty Servers ✅ | Streaming, torrenting, dedicated IP, gaming, NoSpy | Dedicated and static IP, MultiHop |
| Working With Netflix 📺 | Yes, ~10 libraries | Yes, 30+ libraries |
| P2P Allowance ↔️ | Yes | Yes |
| Simultaneous Connections 📟 | 7 | Unlimited |
Applications & Ease of Use
Both providers support every desktop and mobile system, so you’ll suffer zero issues in that regard. The same goes for streaming systems and platforms, like Fire TV Stick (both Fire OS and newer Vega OS), Apple TV, Nvidia Shield TV, and others. They’re also great VPN options for Linux, with support for all major distros.
While compatibility is top-notch on both sides, CyberGhost drops the ball by offering seven simultaneous connections. Surfshark offers unlimited, making it more suited to users with a substantial number of devices or large households.

Ease of use is also on Surfshark’s side. Its modern-looking apps are unrivaled by many of its pricier rivals. The home screen provides access to all of its servers, to which you can connect in seconds. The left-hand side houses settings and other advanced features. Surfshark is smooth and responsive, giving out a fresh and premium vibe.

In the meantime, CyberGhost set its design language long ago, with no changes. It’s the same app with no striking visuals and a rather basic feeling. The Settings menu is still convoluted, so some features are in Settings, and some are in Privacy Settings and Smart Rules, leaving a bad first impression.
Winner: Surfshark 🏆
The first Surfshark vs CyberGhost battle is a no-brainer. Surfshark offers unlimited simultaneous connections and easier-to-use apps. CyberGhost, while widely compatible, can’t match Surfshark’s overall prowess.
CyberGhost vs Surfshark Price Comparison
How much does a VPN cost in 2026? Generally speaking, the price range fluctuates and goes from about two monthly quids to ten times more. Luckily, whichever you choose, Surfshark or CyberGhost, you’ll be closer to the lower side of the spectrum. We’ll examine CyberGhost’s simple pricing structure first:

At $2.03 per month for the 2-year plan at 84% off, CyberGhost has outdone itself one more time. Not to mention four free months on top, which drops the price to a meager $57 for the initial period. Oh, another brave deed: a 45-day money-back guarantee for 2-year and 6-month plans, which sets new records.
CyberGhost offers optional extras like a Security Suite for Windows and a dedicated IP. Both are very affordable, giving CyberGhost incredible value for money. On the other side, there’s Surfshark and its biennial Starter plan at $1.99 per month with three free months. We can see that Surfshark has a tiered plan list.

Our favorite is the Surfshark One plan at $2.29 per month, with built-in antivirus protection and other advanced security features. The Surfshark One+ plan is the highest one, and has Incogni for shielding you against data theft. An interesting thing about Surfshark is that its annual plans are highly affordable.
Our experts reviewed Surfshark and were blown away by their prices. For instance, all three annual plans have three free months, and the Starter plan costs $3.19 per month. So, who do we have winning in this CyberGhost vs Surfshark duel?
Winner: Surfshark 🏆
Again, it’s Surfshark with its record-low starting price of only $1.99 per month. As said, it’s not only about the price, but what Surfshark offers for the money, and as you’ll soon learn, this VPN is a beast.
Surfshark vs CyberGhost VPN: Features Analysis
So far, you trusted our words blindly. We said you’re getting more juice out of Surfshark, but in this round, we’ll prove our observations. We’ll discuss security features, both essential and optional, so let’s go down the rabbit hole.
Shared Features
Surfshark and CyberGhost aren’t sister companies, but they share plenty of features, and in our analysis, these were the most basic VPN features, such as:
- 256-bit bank-grade encryption
- Automatic VPN kill switch
- Split tunneling (CyberGhost offers it only on Android)
- IP/DNS leak protection
- Ad-blocking + tracker protection
- Antivirus (paid additionally in CyberGhost)
- WireGuard and OpenVPN protocols
On paper, we have ample similarities, but the practice tells another tale. Surfshark has split tunneling on all devices, while CyberGhost offers it on Android. Windows users have this Exceptions feature. Is this genuine split tunneling or what? Sort of. It lets you exclude some domains from using a VPN tunnel.

Surfshark’s split tunneling works as expected, and lets you do the same with apps. Find more info about split tunneling and its meaning here, but in the meantime, also be aware that the antivirus tool is facilitated differently. CyberGhost charges you $1 per month on top, while its rival includes it in the Surfshark One plan.

CyberGhost protects your PC, while Surfshark also protects your mobile devices. Same but not the same. We won’t delve deeper into their passive security features like leak protection, Private DNS, RAM servers, etc. As flagship VPNs with the shiny Premium badge, they don’t really skimp on anything.
Unique Features
Unique features are pretty much described in the case of CyberGhost. Though it’s worth mentioning a few from both VPNs. We’ll discuss them right after that:
- NoSpy servers in CyberGhost
- Privacy Guard in CyberGhost
- Optional security features of Surfshark
- Integral security features of Surfshark
NoSpy servers aren’t MultiHop servers, and that’s a sad story. No MultiHop can be found. However, NoSpy servers are great for privacy geeks who want CyberGhost’s self-operated servers devoid of third-party interference. Well, you get plenty, but only in Romania. Understandably so, as CyberGhost is stationed there.

Another one, Privacy Guard, is a relatively new add-on for Windows users. It prevents your operating system, Windows, from spying on you and infringing on your privacy. This is one of CyberGhost’s best features. It blocks all data retention, and even optionally prevents app updates that often bring more bad than good.

Now, Surfshark’s optional features include:
- Antivirus protection
- Alert (dark web monitoring)
- Search (a browser without tracking)
- Alternative ID (a new ID to replace your old one)
We discussed the first one, but Alert is excellent for data breach monitoring. Search, on the other hand, is a private search engine with organic results, no censorship, and maximum privacy. Finally, Alternative ID lets you take on another person by generating an alternative email, persona, and number to conceal your identity.

All of these are part of the Surfshark One plan and above, so be mindful of that. Even if you don’t opt for the bonus suite, you’ll still get essentials, such as NoBorders for bypassing censorship, MultiHop for two encryption layers, and Rotating IP, which rotates your IP every 5 to 10 minutes for maximum privacy.

Keep in mind that NoBorders is essentially obfuscation, which renders the VPN usable in China. During our comparison, we discovered that CyberGhost doesn’t offer it, making it a lot less reliable in countries with restricted internet.
Winner: Surfshark 🏆
The dust has settled, and Surfshark has taken another round with its comprehensive suite of security features that offers more than CyberGhost’s. While the yellow team is by no means bad, it still has ample work to do to match Surfshark’s innovations.
Do Surfshark VPN and CyberGhost Store Logs?
They don’t, and that’s the beauty of both. Surfshark is stationed in the Netherlands, known for its 9 Eyes participation. However, this doesn’t seem to influence this and other similar providers because they still uphold their no-log policies. CyberGhost, on paper, has better jurisdiction. As hinted at, it’s Romania.

Romania isn’t subject to privacy-infringing laws, laying the perfect groundwork for this famous company. After examining their privacy policies, we discovered how pure they are. In short, neither stores sensitive information like:
- Your IP address, originating or assigned by the VPN
- Browsing or downloading history
- Traffic logs and visited websites
- Various location data
It’s worth noting that advanced tools, like an antivirus, have different logging rules. However, all collected information is anonymized, plus it’s deleted shortly after your session ends (in 15 minutes) to minimize privacy risks. The best way to ensure these VPNs really refrain from logging is an audit, and both have them.

Both providers have been audited by at least one third-party security firm. Surfshark’s no-logs policy was verified by Deloitte, right when the VPN switched its jurisdiction from the British Virgin Islands to the Netherlands. Deloitte performed an independent audit on CyberGhost’s no-log policy with the same great results.
We addressed this audit in our CyberGhost review from not long ago.
Winner: Tie ⚖️
Whichever you choose, Surfshark or CyberGhost, expect the highest level of privacy and an ironclad no-logging policy. Audits, RAM-only servers, and every other technology are here for your peace of mind.
Which VPN Is Faster: Surfshark or CyberGhost?
Next on the repertoire is the Surfshark vs CyberGhost speed test. It’s interesting to see how the two affordable VPNs perform. More importantly, there must be a winner because finding two equally fast VPNs is impossible. For the best accuracy and authenticity, we tested them for three days in a row, three times a day.
Using three server locations (the UK, the US, and Japan), we ended up performing nine tests in total. The speed test results we’ll elaborate on are the best ones based on the nine performed tests. At the time of testing, we were in Belgrade, and these were our non-VPN speed test results from speedtest.net:

Here are their average download and upload speed losses using their best results. You will immediately notice that Surfshark is 16% faster in downloads, but 23% slower in uploads. As it’s generally much faster for downloading, it’s often listed as one of the most reliable VPNs for torrenting. Uploading performance is subpar.
| Surfshark | CyberGhost | |
| ⬇️ DL Speed Loss | 27% | 43% |
| ⬆️ UL Speed Loss | 32% | 9% |
But let’s take another look, this time, at the concrete test results. Let’s regurgitate that these were the best results from our comprehensive tests. Again, we notice Surfshark’s superiority in all download speed tests. CyberGhost’s upload superiority makes it better for content creators and faster content delivery.
| 🟢 Surfshark | 🟡 CyberGhost | |
| UK (Download/Upload) | 306.48/16.97 Mbps | 243.07/18.55 Mbps |
| US (Download/Upload) | 253.79/12.47 Mbps | 190.96/18.25 Mbps |
| Japan (Download/Upload) | 191.07/10.90 Mbps | 161.22/16.87 Mbps |
Winner: Surfshark 🏆
Surfshark is the ultimate winner because it displayed better download speeds, which are more important for most people. Besides, its higher speed also resulted in lower latency in our test, perfect for streamers, gamers, and casual browsing. Pick CyberGhost only if you need some of the best upload speeds.
Streaming & Torrenting Comparison
We call this the entertainment round, but really, some VPN users only care about that. They want to unblock NFL live streams, download in P2P, and whatnot. In this CyberGhost vs Surfshark duel, we’ll check out how capable they are.
Streaming Performance
We highlighted earlier that Surfshark is a bit more stable for streaming performance-wise. 4K is a bit smoother here, while CyberGhost’s lower speed retention produces buffering, but it’s not as intense as you’d think. What about unblocking prowess? How do these two compare? On this front, Surfshark is way better.

CyberGhost has dedicated streaming servers. However, during our tests, they didn’t seem to be as reliable as Surfshark’s regular servers. We quickly saw that Surfshark unblocks more than thirty Netflix catalogs, while CyberGhost unblocks 10. The former also has a helpful browser extension with location spoofing.

This allows it to unblock more stubborn platforms, useful when you want to watch ESPN+ outside the USA or access one of many geo-restricted betting websites. Overall, Surfshark is a bit more convincing, with better unblocking prowess and faster speeds for Full HD and 4K streaming without noticeable buffering.
Torrenting Performance
CyberGhost’s dedicated P2P servers are optimized for speed and security. We used them in, and as promised by the VPN, our downloading was swift and fuss-free. Its upload speeds allowed for quick seeding, as well. CyberGhost lacks torrenting extras, such as port forwarding or SOCKS5, but they’re unnecessary either way.

Surfshark has no dedicated torrenting servers, but this isn’t an obstacle. All 4,500 servers are torrent-friendly, so you just have to pick one and start. Performance-wise, Surfshark was on par, if not better, particularly in download speeds. Port forwarding is unavailable in these providers, but PIA, which we tested as well, offers it.

Winner: Surfshark 🏆
Surfshark takes the streaming round due to its superior unblocking prowess. Torrenting is almost a tie, but Surfshark’s higher download speeds may be more optimal for avid torrenters. As a whole, it’s a more complete package.
Server Locations
If you’ve read the Surfshark vs CyberGhost comparison, you’ve noticed that we have already unraveled Surfshark’s number of servers. If you weren’t so meticulous, let’s directly compare CyberGhost vs Surfshark and see which one flexes harder. Excluding the first column, the two providers are startlingly similar.
| Server Count | Countries | Dedicated IP | RAM Servers | 10 Gbps Ports | |
| Surfshark | 4,500+ | 100 | 21 locations | Yes | Yes |
| CyberGhost | 12,000+ | 100 | 19 locations | Yes | Yes |
They offer high-quality 10 Gbps servers based on RAM, with an added variety of dedicated IPs and dedicated servers in CyberGhost. Surfshark even offers static IP address servers, which we haven’t touched on. However, CyberGhost plays a strong number game and decimates Surfshark effortlessly.
We usually don’t put too much emphasis on the number of servers. Instead, we’re fans of a higher server spread, i.e., the number of countries. But when the server count is this high, it’s hard to stay neutral. On top of that, CyberGhost offers more dedicated IP locations, which are also cheaper than Surfshark’s equivalent.
Winner: CyberGhost 🏆
This time, it’s a no-brainer. While they have the same country span, CyberGhost has at least 7,500 more servers than Surfshark, with more dedicated IP address locations and lower prices for a dedicated IP.
Which VPN is More Efficient at Bypassing Censorship?
Overcoming censorship is one of the VPN’s key merits. However, having tested hundreds over the past 15+ years, we noticed a declining trend. A proper example is CyberGhost, a VPN that lacks obfuscation with no plans to implement it in the near future. For years, CyberGhost has been struggling to work in China.
Unfortunately, it’s the same in 2026. We tested CyberGhost in other similar countries like Turkey and Qatar, but since these countries impose”weaker censorship, it was reliable. Now, Surfshark, which uses NoBorders as its means of obfuscation, is considerably better. Despite its low price, it even works in China.

This is because Surfshark masks your VPN connection and makes it look like a regular connection. As a result, the firewall can’t figure out you’re using a VPN, allowing you to stream, browse, and do anything you want.
Winner: Surfshark 🏆
While not necessarily more reliable than Astrill VPN and NordVPN, Surfshark holds its own against the fierce Chinese Great Firewall. Coupled with its insanely low price, Surfshark VPN again triumphs against its adversary.
Conclusion: Pick Surfshark Over CyberGhost in 2026
This CyberGhost vs Surfshark analysis for 2026 broadcasts a strong message. You can have two similarly-priced VPN services with different experiences. CyberGhost is more about its humongous server park, essential security features, and strong privacy. You get what you pay for; it’s that simple. Don’t get us wrong.
That’s perfectly fine. It’s great. It’s amazing. But then, Surfshark has a different view. It does its best to charge you a silly price (under $2, mind you!) but simultaneously provides a VPN service with nearly no flaws. Unlimited simultaneous connections, solid speeds, innovative security, robust privacy, and more.
Surfshark is a more complete VPN, which gives even its more expensive competitors a run for their money. Nord Security merged with Surfshark, which spawned a surge of improvements on Surfshark’s side. Just in case you’re interested, we compared Surfshark and NordVPN recently.
Either way, would you rather get what you paid for or get more than you paid for? It makes sense to desire the latter, right? That’s why Surfshark is still better than CyberGhost, both quality-wise and for savings in the long run.