Surfshark vs ExpressVPN 2026 Comparison

We tested Surfshark and ExpressVPN side by side, scored each round, and ExpressVPN came out ahead. The headline result hides a lot, though. Surfshark wins two categories outright, and depending on what you’re buying a VPN for, those two might be the ones you care about.

This comparison covers apps, pricing, security features, logging, speed, streaming, servers, and censorship, with a winner named after each. The short question underneath it all: pay less for Surfshark, a genuinely cheap VPN, or pay more for ExpressVPN and get more polish? Here’s the answer.

Surfshark vs ExpressVPN: Overview

ExpressVPN took the win, 4 rounds to 2 with two ties. The table has the essentials; the sections below have the reasoning.

	ExpressVPN 🏆	Surfshark VPN
📋 Our Current Ranking	#3	#5
🔖 Starting Prices	$3.19 monthly	$2.49 monthly
💸 Money-Back Guarantee	30 days for all plans	30 days for all plans
🆓 Free Version/Free Trial	No/3 days	No/7 days
📓 Logging/Jurisdiction	No logging/British Virgin Islands	No logging/Netherlands
🔐 Protocols	OpenVPN, IKEv2, Lightway, Lightway Turbo, WireGuard	WireGuard, IKEv2, OpenVPN
🌐 Servers	3,000+ in 113 countries	4,500+ in 100 countries
🔝 Specialty Servers	Dedicated IP	Dedicated IP and Static IP, MultiHop
⛔ Ad Blocking	Yes	Yes
💾 RAM-Only Servers	Yes	Yes
📺 Working With Netflix	Yes (15+ catalogs)	Yes (30+ catalogs)
🔽 P2P Allowance	Yes	Yes
📱 Concurrent Connections	10-14	Unlimited

Apps and Ease of Use: ExpressVPN vs Surfshark

Compatibility is a wash. Both run on Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and iOS, plus smart TVs, consoles, routers, Firestick, and Apple TV. Where they differ is philosophy. ExpressVPN’s app is built around one big connect button and gets out of your way. A first-time VPN user can go from install to protected in under a minute without opening a single menu.

Try ExpressVPN Now

The server list and settings sit underneath for whenever you want them. Surfshark’s app carries more on screen because there’s more to carry: antivirus, Alternative ID, content blocking rules. It’s denser, and occasionally you’ll dig through a submenu that ExpressVPN wouldn’t have needed. We never got lost in it, but a beginner might take a day to feel at home.

Both have browser extensions with WebRTC leak protection, and we rate each among the better VPNs for Chrome. The device math differs: ExpressVPN allows 10 connections on Basic, rising to 14 on Pro. Surfshark allows unlimited on every plan.

Try Surfshark Now

Surfshark is Cheaper than ExpressVPN

Price is where these two are least alike, so let’s put numbers on the gap.

	Minimal Biennial Price	Minimal Annual Price	Minimal Renewal Price
Surfshark	$67.23 upfront	$50.85 upfront	$79 annually
ExpressVPN	$89.32 upfront	$74.85 upfront	$99.95 annually

💰 Surfshark Prices

Surfshark’s 2-year deals come with 3 free months, and Starter opens at $2.49 per month. Starter is the plain VPN. One at $2.79 monthly is the tier we’d point most people to, since it adds the antivirus and identity tools covered later, and One+ at $4.49 bolts on data removal. Unusually, the 1-year plans are discounted too, also with 3 free months. The monthly plans are the trap.

Starter alone costs $16.45 month-to-month. Commit to a term instead, and check our Surfshark coupon page before you do. Every plan carries a 30-day money-back guarantee, with a 7-day mobile trial on top.

Get the Best Price on Surfshark

💰 ExpressVPN Prices

ExpressVPN restructured its pricing and buried its old reputation for costing $7 a month. The 2-year Basic plan now runs $3.19 monthly with 4 free months and a 78% discount. Advanced and Pro add ExpressKeys, email aliases, more connections, and, on Pro, a dedicated IP plus 5 days of free eSIM data for travel. Annual plans exist with 3 free months at higher rates.

Even after the restructure, ExpressVPN costs more than Surfshark at every tier, upfront and at renewal. It offers a 3-day trial plus the standard 30-day guarantee; our ExpressVPN free trial guide walks through claiming it.

Get the Best Price on ExpressVPN

Surfshark is Safer than ExpressVPN: Here’s Why

Surfshark and ExpressVPN actually don’t share much except for the basics. While both work well in practice, and they’re some of the safest VPNs, I’d give Surfshark the edge because of its innovations.

🟢 Shared Features: Basics Covered

• Kill switch. System-level on both, and both held during our connection-drop tests. Surfshark had a wobbly patch years ago; it’s long fixed.
• Post-quantum encryption. Both have moved their key exchanges toward quantum-resistant standards on top of the usual 256-bit encryption.
• Ad and tracker blocking. CleanWeb on Surfshark, Advanced Protection on ExpressVPN. Both catch ads, trackers, and known malicious domains.
• Split tunneling. Route your banking app outside the tunnel while everything else stays inside, on either provider.
• Proprietary protocols. ExpressVPN’s Lightway Turbo is mature, fast, and runs everywhere. Surfshark answered in April 2026 with Dausos, built around per-user tunnels and AEGIS-256X2 encryption with a claimed 30% throughput gain. It’s audited by Cure53 but currently macOS-only, so for now Lightway Turbo is the one you’ll actually use across devices. Advantage ExpressVPN, narrowly and maybe temporarily.

🔴 Unique Features: Where Surfshark Really Takes Off

Our recent ExpressVPN test criticized how thin its advanced feature set is for the price. Surfshark piles features on. This round was never in doubt.

❌ Parental Control and Web Content Blocker (ExpressVPN and Surfshark)

ExpressVPN’s Parental Control is a single on/off switch for adult content. It does the job, but you can’t pick categories, and it blocks torrent sites along the way whether you wanted that or not. Gambling sites, oddly, stay reachable.

Surfshark’s Web Content Blocker does the same idea with actual controls: separate toggles for adult content, drugs, gambling, malware, phishing, and individual sites you name yourself. Quite handy.

↔️ Dynamic MultiHop (Surfshark)

MultiHop chains your connection through two servers in different countries, and Surfshark lets you pick both the entry and exit yourself. ExpressVPN has no equivalent, a strange gap in a premium product. Expect a speed cost, as doubling the route always carries one; for raw pace, our fastest VPNs for 2026 list is the better shopping guide.

🦠 Antivirus (Surfshark)

From the One plan up, Surfshark bundles an antivirus into the same app. We ran it against a handful of dedicated antivirus products on the same threat samples, and it kept pace on both detection and removal, which is more than bundled security tools usually manage.

🔄 IP Rotation (Surfshark)

IP Rotation swaps your address every few minutes without dropping the tunnel. Connect to a UK server, and you keep a UK identity throughout, just never the same one for long. It frustrates the kind of tracking that follows a single IP across sessions, and because the connection never breaks, you don’t notice it happening.

🎁 ExpressVPN vs Surfshark: Other Extras

Beyond the VPN itself, the two companies are heading different directions. Surfshark stacks privacy tools: ID theft protection, its private Search product, Alternative ID. ExpressVPN branches wider, with ExpressAI for privacy-focused prompting across 5 models, an email relay, and eSIM data through Holiday. Handy, though little of it is VPN functionality in the strict sense.

Surfshark and ExpressVPN Don’t Store Logs

Jurisdiction first. ExpressVPN operates from the British Virgin Islands, outside every intelligence-sharing alliance and free of data retention mandates. Surfshark sits in the Netherlands, a Nine Eyes member and an EU state, a weaker starting position on paper even if it has never translated into an actual logging problem.

📜 Privacy Policy Analysis

In practice, neither keeps logs. Surfshark moved from the BVI to the Netherlands, and its policy survived the move intact: an email address, minimal diagnostics, nothing more. No timestamps, no browsing history, no IP addresses, no DNS queries. ExpressVPN’s policy makes the same commitments, and both VPNs run their servers on RAM, where a reboot wipes everything.

 

On verification, their record diverges. Surfshark’s no-log claims have been audited by Deloitte twice, in 2023 and 2025, with Cure53 separately auditing its Dausos protocol. ExpressVPN has racked up over 20 audits across different firms, KPMG’s repeated no-log confirmations among them, most recently in February 2025.

ExpressVPN is Faster than Surfshark: Speed Tests

Every VPN costs you some speed. Encryption and the extra hop see to that, so the question is only how much. We measured from Belgrade over three days, three sessions a day, against servers in the UK, the USA, and Japan, with protocol selection left on Automatic so each provider made its own choices.

Downloads are close, a 3-point gap that you’d struggle to notice outside a benchmark. Uploads are not close. Surfshark shed 32% to ExpressVPN’s 9%, and that is the difference between a clean video call and a choppy one.

	Download Speed Loss 📥	Upload Speed Loss 📤
Surfshark	27%	32%
ExpressVPN	24%	9%

Per-location results:

	UK (DL/UL)	US (DL/UL)	Japan (DL/UL)
Surfshark	306.48/16.97 Mbps	253.79/12.47 Mbps	191.07/10.90 Mbps
ExpressVPN	298.82/18.50 Mbps	274.61/18.35 Mbps	206.33/16.73 Mbps

Surfshark vs ExpressVPN for Streaming and P2P

ExpressVPN is faster overall, so it’s better for gaming. Does it translate to streaming and P2P  in this case? Sort of, but for a few other reasons, too.

🎥 Streaming Tests

On Netflix specifically, Surfshark is the stronger unblocker: it opened 30+ regional catalogs in our tests against roughly 15 for ExpressVPN. If your whole reason for a VPN is hopping between Netflix regions, you have your pick.

Beyond Netflix, both cleared everything we threw at them, including the harder targets like Hulu, Sky Sports, and ESPN+. Playback quality is where ExpressVPN pulled ahead: its 4K streams never faltered, while Surfshark occasionally stumbled and pushed us down from Ultra HD to Full HD until the connection settled. ExpressVPN also offers SmartDNS; its rival has removed it entirely.

Here’s an overview of our full streaming testing results. The table comfortably confirms what we said: Both VPNs perform exceptionally well.

	Surfshark	ExpressVPN
Netflix US	✅ Works	✅ Works
Prime Video US	✅ Works	✅ Works
BBC iPlayer	✅ Works	✅ Works
Sky Sports	✅ Works	✅ Works
HBO Max	✅ Works	✅ Works
Paramount+	✅ Works	✅ Works
YouTube TV	✅ Works	✅ Works

🧲 Torrenting Tests

Every server on both networks is P2P-friendly, no special server hunting required, which is part of why both appear in our best premium VPNs ranking.

Download speeds tilted marginally toward ExpressVPN, though on the nearby servers you’d use for torrenting, the two were indistinguishable.

ExpressVPN vs Surfshark: Server Network

This section needed a rewrite because ExpressVPN moved the goalposts in July 2026, so here are the new, revised numbers:

• Surfshark: 4,500+ servers in 100 countries.
• ExpressVPN: 3,000+ servers in 113 countries, across 214 app-selectable locations after its network expansion added Nuuk, Lagos, Doha, Valencia, and Manchester, among others.

So each wins a different measure. Surfshark runs roughly 50% more physical servers, which helps with congestion. ExpressVPN now covers 13 more countries and offers far finer location choice, down to picking between seven different endpoints within the UK alone. Its US spread remains wider too, which is what you want for streaming. One caveat on the shiny new number.

Locations aren’t cities, and several of the 214 resolve to neighborhoods of the same metro area. On variety, Surfshark answers with Static IP servers included free and Dedicated IPs at $3.75/mo; ExpressVPN sells dedicated IPs as an add-on. Both have 10 Gbps server ports, and both play well with Tor for dark web access.

Both VPNs Work in China and Bypass Censorship

Both can beat censorship, but they ask different amounts of work from you, and this is where most comparisons get sloppy.

ExpressVPN applies obfuscation automatically. Connect, and traffic is already disguised; no settings involved. Surfshark splits the job across two features: NoBorders finds you servers that survive restricted networks, while Camouflage Mode does the traffic disguising, and Camouflage only runs on OpenVPN. Leave the app on its default, and the obfuscation never engages.

Our Surfshark China guide walks through the setup. Configured correctly, both got through in our checks, and both also handle Iran, the UAE, Qatar, Russia, and Turkey. Against the Great Firewall, neither is bulletproof, and results shift with the censors’ updates. For the most reliable picks there, see our best VPNs for China.

Surfshark vs ExpressVPN 2026: Conclusion

ExpressVPN wins, 4 rounds to 2, and this year its case got stronger with the 113-country expansion and its upload speeds staying untouchable.

⭐ ExpressVPN is Better for:

• Privacy and jurisdiction
• Streaming performance
• Speeds, especially uploads
• Server reach (113 countries, 214 locations)

⭐ Surfshark is Better for:

• Simultaneous connections (unlimited)
• Price (roughly 40% cheaper at entry)
• Security features (antivirus, MultiHop, IP Rotation)
• Netflix catalog count

Apps and censorship ended even. The practical advice: households with many devices and tight budgets lose almost nothing choosing Surfshark. Everyone else gets the more refined product in ExpressVPN, and pays for the refinement.

Visit ExpressVPN

---

Frequently Asked Questions